Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• alternate track on the char-ready? issue, (continued)
  • alternate track on the char-ready? issue, Kent M Pitman
    • alternate track on the char-ready? issue, Chris Hanson
  • char-ready? => read-char-ready?, Jonathan A Rees
  • Re: char-ready? => read-char-ready?, R. Kent Dybvig
  • Re: char-ready? => read-char-ready?, R. Kent Dybvig
• seconds-after-J2000.0, John D. Ramsdell
  • seconds-after-J2000.0, Hal Abelson
    • days-after-J2000.0, John D. Ramsdell
      • days-after-J2000.0, gls
    • days-after-J2000.0, John D. Ramsdell
    • days-after-J2000.0, John D. Ramsdell
      • Re: days-after-J2000.0, willc
• More on Full Specification, Robert Hieb
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: More on Full Specification, Eric S. Tiedemann
    • Dependency analysis on internal DEFINE's, John D. Ramsdell
      • Re: Dependency analysis on internal DEFINE's, willc
  • Re: More on Full Specification, Paul Hudak
  • Re: More on Full Specification, Eric S. Tiedemann
    • Re: More on Full Specification, willc
      • More on Full Specification, James Miller
  • Re: More on Full Specification, Paul Hudak
    • parallel argument evaluation, Robert Halstead
  • Re: More on Full Specification, Eric S. Tiedemann
  • More on Full Specification, David Bartley
• A couple more details, Kent M Pitman
• days-after-J2000.0, Jonathan A Rees
• new wording for eqv?, willc
  • new wording for eqv?, Kent M Pitman
    • new wording for eqv?, gls
      • new wording for eqv?, Mitchell Wand
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • new wording for eqv?, Jonathan A Rees
• formal semantics of numeric constants, willc
• Re: parallel argument evaluation, Paul Hudak
  • Re: parallel argument evaluation, Robert Halstead
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • parallel argument evaluation, Jonathan A Rees
  • Re: parallel argument evaluation, Paul Hudak
• Re: Dependency analysis on internal DEFINE's, Eric S. Tiedemann
• Meetings, Dick Gabriel
• Optionals, version 1, willc
• Multiple values, version 1, willc
• eqv? version 2, willc
• List of attendees (tentative), willc
• formal proposal: A Modified Procedural Interface, Robert Hieb
• informal proposal: A Modified Procedural Interface, Robert Hieb
• sanity check: <=, >=, willc
  • sanity check: <=, >=, gls
• Re: Multiple values, Version 1, Chris Haynes
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: Multiple values, Version 1, Chris Haynes
• informal proposal: A Modified Procedural Interface (LONG), Guillermo J. Rozas
• duplicated formals, Jonathan Rees
• agenda, willc
  • Replace LETREC with "relaxed" internal DEFINES., ramsdell%linus
    • Re: Replace LETREC with "relaxed" internal DEFINES., willc
      • Replace LETREC with "relaxed" internal definitions., ramsdell%linus
      • Making local definitions more like top-level definitions., ramsdell%linus
  • RE: agenda, Andrew A. Berlin
    • agenda, Jonathan Rees
• Proposals compendium, Jonathan A Rees
• time & place of R*RS authors' meeting, willc
• Extended local defines., ramsdell%linus
  • Extended local defines., ramsdell%linus
• No Subject, Paul Hudak
• RE: lisp conf scheme agenda, Perry Wagle
• Snowbird minutes?, Pavel.pa
• named let -> ???, ramsdell%linus
  • named let -> ???, gls
    • named let -> ???, ramsdell%linus
      • named let -> ???, Hal Abelson
      • NAMED-LET sounds good to me., ramsdell%linus
      • NAMED-LET sounds good to me, too., Arthur Gleckler
      • named let -> ???, gls
      • named let -> ???, Hal Abelson
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: named let -> ???, R. Kent Dybvig
  • Re: named let -> ???, markf
  • Re: named let -> ???, Pavel.pa
  • Re: named let -> ???, Pavel.pa
    • named let -> ???, gls
    • Re: named let -> ???, Kent M Pitman
  • Re: named let -> ???, R. Kent Dybvig
  • named let -> ???, David Bartley
    • named let -> ???, Arthur Gleckler
  • named let -> ???, markf
  • Re: named let -> ???, R. Kent Dybvig
  • Re: named let -> ???, R. Kent Dybvig
• Named LET -> RECLET, Michael R. Blair
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Named LET -> RECLET, Guillermo J. Rozas
• named-let proposal, George Springer
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • named-let proposal, Jim Miller
  • Re: named-let proposal, R. Kent Dybvig
• Yet more Named Let flamage, Arthur Gleckler
• Re: named LET -> RECLET, Ziggy
• Summarizing the named-let debate, Pavel.pa
  • Summarizing the named-let debate, Daniel Weise
• Clarification on named let, George Springer
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Clarification on named let, Guillermo J. Rozas
  • Clarification on named let, gls
  • Re: Clarification on named let, Pavel.pa
• Named-let squabble: Kiss and make up!, Gerald Jay Sussman
• Why named LET anyway?, Michael R. Blair
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: Why named LET anyway?, Pavel.pa
• named let again, R. Kent Dybvig
• named let ::: call it A-LET-NAMED, ramsdell%linus
• problems with named-let, Hal Abelson
  • problems with named-let, Jim Miller
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: problems with named-let, R. Kent Dybvig
  • Re: problems with named-let, Chris Haynes
• minutes from Utah, William Clinger
• Compromise, George Springer
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Compromise, Jim Miller
• demur on recur, Hal Abelson
  • "DEFLET"?, Alan Bawden
    • "DEFLET"?, Mitchell Wand
      • "DEFLET"?, Chris Hanson
• re- named-let, Norman Adams
• Re: "DEFLET"?, Michael R. Blair
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: "DEFLET"?, R. Kent Dybvig
• IEEE Scheme Standardization Meeting, Chris Haynes
• scheme-standard mailing list, Chris Haynes
• report on Snowbird authors' meeting, William Clinger
  • Peek-char for R4RS?, ramsdell%linus
• Regularization of Procedures in Scheme, Morris Katz
  • Re: Regularization of Procedures in Scheme, Pavel.pa
  • Regularization of Procedures in Scheme (pair setters), ramsdell%linus
    • Regularization of Procedures in Scheme (pair setters), Guillermo J. Rozas
      • Regularization of Procedures in Scheme (pair setters), Arthur Gleckler
      • Regularization of Procedures in Scheme (pair setters), gls
    • Re: Regularization of Procedures in Scheme (pair setters), Pavel.pa
  • Regularization of Procedures in Scheme (pair setters), ramsdell%linus
    • Regularization of Procedures in Scheme (pair setters), ramsdell%linus
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: Regularization of Procedures in Scheme, Pavel.pa
    • Regularization of Procedures in Scheme, Morris Katz
  • Re: Regularization of Procedures in Scheme, William Clinger
• (NOT '())?, Pavel.pa
• null begin forms, Chris Haynes
• R4RS number syntax, William Clinger