[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
NAMED-LET sounds good to me, too.
To
:
ramsdell%linus@mitre-bedford.ARPA
Subject
: NAMED-LET sounds good to me, too.
From
:
arthur@DUMBO.AI.MIT.EDU
(Arthur Gleckler)
Date
: Thu, 1 Sep 88 15:41:33 edt
Cc
:
rrrs-authors@mc.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To
: ramsdell%linus@mitre-bedford.ARPA's message of Thu, 1 Sep 88 15:02:02 EDT <
8809011902.AA06429@huxley.sun.uucp
>
Reply-To
:
arthur%zurich@mc.lcs.mit.edu
NAMED-LET is fine by me, too, as long as we don't remove the existing syntax. Arthur
References
:
NAMED-LET sounds good to me.
From:
ramsdell%linus@mitre-bedford.ARPA
Prev by Date:
NAMED-LET sounds good to me.
Next by Date:
Re: named let -> ???
Prev by thread:
NAMED-LET sounds good to me.
Next by thread:
named let -> ???
Index(es):
Date
Thread