[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NO newsgroup

To: "John H. Kim" <jokim@tuna.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: NO newsgroup
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 20:31:57 -0500
Cc: Paulo Magalhaes <pm119@columbia.edu>, tp750@cs.utk.edu, moore@cs.utk.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 31 Oct 1995 18:12:00 EST." <Pine.LNX.3.91.951031174953.7820A-100000@tuna.mit.edu>
Sender: moore@cs.utk.edu

> 6) I can see why Keith wanted us to email him comments on the idea so
> he could summarize.  This thread is killing the S/N ratio here.

yes, that's why.  unfortunately I'm swamped and the comments
people submitted earlier are buried in my ~10000 unfiled messages
in my inbox (I keep pushing exmh's limit of 9999 messages/folder).
My best recollection is that respondents were about evenly
split for/against a newsgroup.

It does seem like people would rather discuss how to run the
list than anything else...

Keith

References:
- Re: NO newsgroup
  - From: "John H. Kim" <jokim@tuna.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: SCSI backup
Next by Date: tp750 digest
Prev by thread: Re: NO newsgroup
Next by thread: Re: NO newsgroup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread