Mail Index

• Thread Index

• can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
  • From: "R. Kent Dybvig" <dyb@cs.indiana.edu>
• can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
  • From: Guillermo J. Rozas <gjr@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
  • From: Guillermo J. Rozas <gjr@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
  • From: Matthias Blume <blume@cs.Princeton.EDU>
• Re: can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
  • From: "Ozan S. Yigit" <oz@sis.yorku.ca>
• Re: can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
  • From: "John D. Ramsdell" <ramsdell@linus.mitre.org>
• Re: can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
  • From: kend@newton.apple.com (Ken Dickey)
• Begin flattening documentation bug (CC)
  • From: KenD@Newton.apple.com (Ken Dickey)
• Re: Begin flattening documentation bug (CC)
  • From: "R. Kent Dybvig" <dyb@cs.indiana.edu>
• the Scheme Repository moves to a new home
  • From: "ozan s. yigit" <oz@sis.yorku.ca>
• Proposal for a module system
  • From: Matthias Blume <blume@cs.Princeton.EDU>
• R^4 RS in Texinfo?
  • From: Michael R. Blair <ziggy@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• evaluation order for combinations
  • From: Christian Queinnec <Christian.Queinnec@inria.fr>
• Re: evaluation order for combinations
  • From: "John D. Ramsdell" <ramsdell@linus.mitre.org>
• quasiquote vs. cons & friends
  • From: Matthias Blume <blume@cs.Princeton.EDU>
• quasiquote vs. cons & friends
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• quasiquote vs. cons & friends
  • From: Chris Hanson <cph@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• evaluation order for combinations (again)
  • From: Christian Queinnec <Christian.Queinnec@inria.fr>
• (= 4 4.0)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• (= 4 4.0)
  • From: Chris Hanson <cph@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• (= 4 4.0)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• (= 4 4.0)
  • From: Chris Hanson <cph@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: (= 4 4.0)
  • From: William Clinger <will@skinner.cs.uoregon.edu>
• Updating the IEEE Scheme
  • From: Christopher Haynes <chaynes@cs.indiana.edu>
• test
  • From: Steve Kinzler <kinzler@cs.indiana.edu>
• test2
  • From: Steve Kinzler <kinzler@cs.indiana.edu>
• r4rs.texi
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• EQ? imply EQUAL?
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Updating the IEEE Scheme standard
  • From: Christopher Haynes <chaynes@cs.indiana.edu>
• Reaffirming the standard
  • From: Kent M Pitman <kmp@harlequin.com>
• Reaffirming the standard
  • From: Hal Abelson <hal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Updating the IEEE Scheme standard
  • From: Gerald Jay Sussman <gjs@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: Reaffirming the standard
  • From: "John D. Ramsdell" <ramsdell@linus.mitre.org>
• Re: Updating the IEEE Scheme standard
  • From: Ken Dickey <KenD@newton.apple.com>
• IEEE Standard
  • From: Christopher Haynes <chaynes@cs.indiana.edu>
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: Hal Abelson <hal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: feeley@iro.umontreal.ca
• IEEE Standard
  • From: Jim Miller <jmiller@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: Sidney_Marshall.WBST128@xerox.com
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: Jeff Dalton <jeff@aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk>
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: Ken Dickey <KenD@newton.apple.com>
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: dak@sq.com
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: Ken Dickey <KenD@newton.apple.com>
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: Ken Dickey <KenD@newton.apple.com>
• Re: IEEE Standard
  • From: dak@sq.com
• Re: Unspecified order of evaluation in Scheme
  • From: Mitchell Wand <wand@ccs.neu.edu>
• Re: Unspecified order of evaluation in Scheme
  • From: Matthias Blume <blume@CS.Princeton.EDU>
• Unspecified order of evaluation in Scheme
  • From: Jim Miller <jmiller@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: Unspecified order of evaluation in Scheme
  • From: Mitchell Wand <wand@ccs.neu.edu>
• Re: Unspecified order of evaluation in Scheme
  • From: Christian Queinnec <Christian.Queinnec@inria.fr>
• Re: Unspecified order of evaluation in Scheme
  • From: William D Clinger <will@ccs.neu.edu>
• Unspecified order of evaluation in Scheme
  • From: Morry Katz <katz@quilty.Stanford.EDU>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: "John D. Ramsdell" <ramsdell@linus.mitre.org>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: Michael R. Blair <ziggy@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: David Carlton <carlton@math.mit.edu>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: "John D. Ramsdell" <ramsdell@linus.mitre.org>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: KenD@Newton.apple.com (Ken Dickey)
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: "Ozan S. Yigit" <oz@gold.sni.ca>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: Rick Mohr <rick@archetype.prospect.com>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: Mark Friedman <bobo@ptolemy-ethernet.arc.nasa.gov>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: Michael R. Blair <ziggy@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: "Ozan S. Yigit" <oz@gold.sni.ca>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: hudak-paul@CS.YALE.EDU
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: Mark Friedman <bobo@ptolemy-ethernet.arc.nasa.gov>
• GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: Guillermo J. Rozas <gjr@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: "ozan s. yigit" <oz@nexus.yorku.ca>
• GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: Guillermo J. Rozas <gjr@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: "John D. Ramsdell" <ramsdell@linus.mitre.org>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: GNU Extension Language Plans
  • From: KenD@Newton.apple.com (Ken Dickey)
• Stallman
  • From: Richard Mlynarik <mly@adoc.xerox.com>
• Purify'd scheme(s) -- a contribution to the `GEL = SCM + RMS' debate
  • From: Matthias Blume <blume@CS.Princeton.EDU>
• Re: Purify'd scheme(s) -- a contribution to the `GEL = SCM + RMS' debate
  • From: Matthias Blume <blume@CS.Princeton.EDU>
• Re: Purify'd scheme(s) -- a contribution to the `GEL = SCM + RMS' debate
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Scheme--? (was: Purify'd scheme(s) etc.)
  • From: Olivier Danvy <danvy@daimi.aau.dk>
• Re Purify'd scheme(s) ...
  • From: "Ozan S. Yigit" <oz@gold.sni.ca>
• Re: Purify'd scheme(s) -- a contribution to the `GEL = SCM + RMS' debate
  • From: Matthias Blume <blume@CS.Princeton.EDU>
• Re: [Purify] Purify'd scheme(s) -- a contribution to the `GEL = SCM + RMS' debate
  • From: Stanley Lanning <lanning@pure.com>
• # in place of a digit.
  • From: David Carlton <carlton@math.mit.edu>
• Re: # in place of a digit.
  • From: Matthias Blume <blume@CS.Princeton.EDU>
• Re: # in place of a digit.
  • From: halstead@crl.dec.com
• # in place of a digit.
  • From: Gerald Jay Sussman <gjs@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• # in place of a digit.
  • From: Gerald Jay Sussman <gjs@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• # in place of a digit.
  • From: Gerald Jay Sussman <gjs@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: # in place of a digit.
  • From: KenD@apple.com (Ken Dickey)
• Re: # in place of a digit.
  • From: David Carlton <carlton@math.mit.edu>
• # in place of a digit.
  • From: Chris Hanson <cph@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author
• No Subject
  • From: No Author