Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: Format descriptors in NUMBER->STRING ?, R. Kent Dybvig
• RE^2: Format Descriptors, Michael R. Blair
• Minutes of the 4th Scheme standarization meeting, Chris Haynes
• Scheme standard balloting, Chris Haynes
• URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, will
  • URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Guillermo J. Rozas
  • Re: disjointness of '() and #f, kend%mrloog.wr.tek.com
    • disjointness of '() and #f, Guillermo J. Rozas
      • disjointness of '() and #f, Eric Benson
      • Re: disjointness of '() and #f, kend%mrloog.wr.tek.com
    • disjointness of '() and #f, Arthur Gleckler
      • Re: disjointness of '() and #f, kend%mrloog.wr.tek.com
      • disjointness of '() and #f, Guillermo J. Rozas
      • Re: disjointness of '() and #f, kend%mrloog.wr.tek.com
  • Re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, ramsdell
    • URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Juha Hein{nen
  • #f, '(), and true radicalism., Daniel Weise
    • #f, '(), and true radicalism., Guillermo J. Rozas
  • URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Kent M Pitman
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Dick Gabriel
  • Re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Pavel_Curtis.PARC
  • Re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, J. A. Durieux
    • URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Guillermo J. Rozas
  • Re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Jeff Dalton
  • Re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Robert Hieb
    • URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Guillermo J. Rozas
  • Re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Jeff Dalton
  • Re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, will
  • URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Carsten Bormann
  • Re: URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED!!!!!, Jeff Dalton
• disjointness of null? and boolean?, Guillermo J. Rozas
• [jinx: disjointness of types], Guillermo J. Rozas
• '() vs #F AND assignment to t-l vars., Jim Miller
• Re: disjointness of '() and #f, Jeff Dalton
  • Re: disjointness of '() and #f, kend%mrloog.wr.tek.com
• '() and #f, Morris Katz
  • the next RNRS meeting, ramsdell
    • the next RNRS meeting, Morris Katz
• Tentative Proposal: '() vs #F, Michael R. Blair
• Next meeting., Guillermo J. Rozas
  • Re: Next meeting., halstead
• Comments and poll on () [long message], Chris Haynes
  • Re: Comments and poll on () [long message], kend
  • Comments and poll on () [long message], Kent M Pitman
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Comments and poll on () [long message], Morris Katz
  • Re: Comments and poll on () [long message], Marshall.wbst
• RE: (#F v. ()) v. Standardization, Michael R. Blair
• Module proposal [long], James R. Rauen
  • Re: Module proposal [long], ramsdell
• Retracted vote., John Gateley
• Comments and poll on (), Jim Miller
• list of implementations, Jonathan Rees
• results of the poll, Chris Haynes
• (not (eq? '() #f)), will
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • (not (eq? '() #f)), Jim Miller
• (maybe (eq? '() #f)), will
• Re: modules, James R. Rauen
• lexical list, Dan Friedman
  • lexical list, Jonathan Rees
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: lexical list, Pavel_Curtis.PARC
    • Re: lexical list, markf
  • Re: lexical list, Pavel_Curtis.PARC
    • Re: lexical list, markf
      • lexical list, Jim Miller
    • lexical list, Guillermo J. Rozas
  • Re: lexical list, R. Kent Dybvig
  • lexical list, Chris Hanson
  • Re: lexical list, Pavel_Curtis.PARC
• Scheme Modules paper available, Pavel_Curtis.PARC
• A module question, ramsdell
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: A module question, James R. Rauen
  • Re: A module question, Pavel_Curtis.PARC
• [oz@nexus.yorku.ca: ports...], Guillermo J. Rozas
• ports (really disjointness of types), will
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: ports (really disjointness of types), R. Kent Dybvig
• tail recursion, Luddy Harrison
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: tail recursion, R. Kent Dybvig
    • tail recursion, Luddy Harrison
  • re: tail recursion, Dick Gabriel
    • tail recursion, Morris Katz
      • tail recursion, Gyro
      • tail recursion, Guillermo J. Rozas
      • tail recursion, Luddy Harrison
      • tail recursion, Guillermo J. Rozas
      • tail recursion, Luddy Harrison
      • Re: tail recursion, markf
      • Re: tail recursion, halstead
      • tail recursion, Daniel Weise
      • tail recursion, Luddy Harrison
      • Re: tail recursion, halstead
      • Re: tail recursion, halstead
      • tail recursion, Guy Steele
      • tail recursion, Luddy Harrison
      • tail recursion, Guy Steele
      • Re: tail recursion, Warren Harris
      • tail recursion, Guy Steele
      • tail recursion and debugging, Scott Layson Burson
      • tail recursion and debugging, Guillermo J. Rozas
      • tail recursion, Scott Layson Burson
  • tail recursion, Marc Feeley
    • tail recursion, Jonathan Rees
      • tail recursion, Marc Feeley
  • Re: tail recursion, Jeff Dalton
    • tail recursion, Guy Steele
  • Re: tail recursion, halstead
  • re: tail recursion, Dick Gabriel
    • tail recursion, Scott Layson Burson
    • tail recursion, Morris Katz
  • Re: tail recursion, bartlett
    • tail recursion, Guillermo J. Rozas
  • re: tail recursion, R. Kent Dybvig
  • Re: tail recursion, Jeff Dalton
    • tail recursion, Guy Steele
  • re: tail recursion, Jeff Dalton
    • tail recursion, Luddy Harrison
• tail recursion *is* semantic, Michael R. Blair
• Tail call vs debugging, Michael R. Blair
• some implementations that are P.T.R., Luddy Harrison
• Re: tail recursion (LONG), Michael R. Blair
• No Subject, kend%mrloog.wr.tek.com
• tail-recursion, Luddy Harrison
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • re: tail-recursion, Dick Gabriel
    • tail-recursion, Scott Layson Burson
• Macros -- what's happening?, Jeff Dalton
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: Macros -- what's happening?, William Clinger
• Characters [No, *not* the authors ;-], Ken Dickey
• What does read-char get at the end of a line?, ramsdell
• Scheme Standard ballot results, Chris Haynes
• let : let* :: do : do*, Aubrey Jaffer
  • do is horrible, Olin Shivers
• macros again, Jeff Dalton
  <Possible follow-up(s)>
  
  • Re: macros again, R. Kent Dybvig
  • Re: macros again, will
• Scheme standard approved, Chris Haynes
• forward from Clyde Camp, Chris Haynes
• numerical procedures in scheme, Aubrey Jaffer
  • numerical procedures in scheme, Chris Hanson
• disjointness of types, jinx