[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Win 95 RAM Usage

To: Steve Hultquist <ssh@wwsi.com>
Subject: Re: Win 95 RAM Usage
From: Ben <ben@edelweb.fr>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:25:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: thinkpad@CS.UTK.EDU
In-Reply-To: <199609041431.IAA05336@aspen.wwsi.com>

> Not exactly. The question is how much of the *physical* memory is used versus
> swapping to disk. Physical memory -- especially in notebooks with slow disks --
> is much faster than paged memory. If you can keep most of your work in RAM
> instead of swap, everything will be faster.

Hell, physical memory even in notebooks with FAST disks is still much
faster than swap.

Ben.
____
Ben Samman.................................................ben@edelweb.fr
Paris, France                      Illudium Q36 Explosive Space Modulator

References:
- Re: Win 95 RAM Usage
  - From: Steve Hultquist <ssh@wwsi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Anyone have a 32MB SO-DIMM running in their 701???
Next by Date: Windows NT 3.5 on Thinkpad 701
Prev by thread: Re: Win 95 RAM Usage
Next by thread: Re: Win 95 RAM Usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread