Re: Windows 95

[<Dunaway_Wesley/furman@furman.edu>]

Item Subject: Message text
>>Your performance numbers are not that 
>>much of a suprise given that you ran
>>OS/2 on a stacked FAT partition. 
I *have* run it on a stacked FAT partition.  This I found to be too
slow to tolerate.  Recently, I have been running, like you, with a
complete HPFS system.

Without compression, though, it's been hard to find disk space on my
little 170MB hard drive.

>>I run OS/2 
>>on my thinkpad and have set it up with an HPFS 
>>partition. Performance if VERY much faster than
>>running under FAT. 
I agree.

Wesley Dunaway