[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WIN95: appropriate?

To: tp750@CS.UTK.EDU, jesse@spine.com (jesse montrose)
Subject: Re: WIN95: appropriate?
From: eac@world.std.com (Eric A Cottrell)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 1994 22:14:51 -0500

If you been partially released from the NDA, can you discuss how good it runs
compared to WIN31?

Of course that is not always valid to compare betas as some
betas are faster than the released code. You cannot always trust a feature
in the beta to be in the release and it seem that there has been some added
features recently unveiled.

In light of past experience I get a chuckle over heavy discussions about how
great WIN95 is. It may be but I rather wait until it is released.

My personal opinion is to keep it on the list and put an WIN95: in front.
I would think that there would be an Win95 mailing list already.

73 Eric  eac@world.std.com  soon to be eac@shore.net

Prev by Date: Thinkpad: IBM Internet-based support
Next by Date: Re: Thinkpad: IBM Internet-based support
Prev by thread: Re: WIN95: appropriate?
Next by thread: Re: WIN95: appropriate?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread