[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compatibility with Common Lisp: A meta comment

To: RPG%su-ai@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA, rrrs-authors%mc.lcs.mit.edu@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
Subject: Re: Compatibility with Common Lisp: A meta comment
From: Don Oxley <OXLEY%ti-csl.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA>
Date: Mon 14 Jul 86 08:11:52-CDT
In-Reply-To: Message from "Dick Gabriel <RPG@su-ai.ARPA>" of Sat 12 Jul 86 18:35:00-CDT

I must second Dick Gabriel's reply.  A little "friendly rivalry" with
Common Lisp is fine, but the ultimate acceptance of Lisp (of either
dialect) is the crucial concern.  I am probably as biased toward Scheme
as anyuone, but if Scheme is to succeed, it will owe a significant debt
to Common Lisp. 

        --Don
-------

Prev by Date: Flaws of form
Next by Date: Common Lisp
Prev by thread: Compatibility with Common Lisp: A meta comment
Next by thread: Scheme's DO construct
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread