[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Space requirements
> I am pleased with the section on proper tail recursion in R5RS,
> however, I worried about the wisdom of referencing a paper in the
> standard that has not been read by the authors. While I have great
> faith in Will, what happens if public exposure of the paper reveils a
> serious flaw in the paper?
Any R5RS author who wants to examine the current draft of that
paper between now and Thursday can fetch it by anonymous ftp
Appendix A will probably not be part of the conference paper,
and there will be other changes as well.