[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: requiring proper tail recursion

To: hbaker@netcom.com
Subject: Re: requiring proper tail recursion
From: Guillermo J. Rozas <gjr@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 12:32:52 -0400
Cc: kmp@harlequin.com, gls@livia.East.Sun.COM, katz@cs.stanford.edu, will@ccs.neu.edu, rrrs-authors@martigny.ai.mit.edu, hbaker@netcom.com, jgm@cs.cornell.edu, matthias@cs.rice.edu, shriram@cs.rice.edu
In-Reply-To: <199706030104.SAA13238@netcom13.netcom.com> (hbaker@netcom.com)
Reply-To: gjr@martigny.ai.mit.edu

|   From: hbaker@netcom.com (Henry G. Baker)
|   Subject: Re: requiring proper tail recursion
|   Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 18:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
|   
|   (I don't consider the issue of debugging to be the controlling issue
|   here; debugging is for finding errors in programs, but it should never
|   keep you from writing a program in the first place -- that's the job
|   for type systems.)

This is priceless.

References:
- Re: requiring proper tail recursion
  - From: hbaker@netcom.com (Henry G. Baker)

Prev by Date: Re: addendum about informality and tail recursion
Next by Date: Re: Philosophical tail-recursion question
Prev by thread: Re: requiring proper tail recursion
Next by thread: Re: requiring proper tail recursion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread