[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: addendum about informality and tail recursion

To: kmp@harlequin.com
Subject: Re: addendum about informality and tail recursion
From: Gerald Jay Sussman <gjs@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 12:26:25 -0400
Cc: katz@cs.stanford.edu, will@ccs.neu.edu, rrrs-authors@martigny.ai.mit.edu, hbaker@netcom.com, jgm@cs.cornell.edu, matthias@cs.rice.edu, shriram@cs.rice.edu, will@ccs.neu.edu
In-Reply-To: <1306.9706022233@romulus.harlequin.com> (message from Kent Pitmanon Mon, 2 Jun 97 18:33:58 EDT)

On the other hand, words like stack imply an implementation strategy,
which may not be what we intend.

Follow-Ups:
- addendum about informality and tail recursion
  - From: Kent Pitman <kmp@harlequin.com>

References:
- addendum about informality and tail recursion
  - From: Kent Pitman <kmp@harlequin.com>

Prev by Date: Re: requiring proper tail recursion
Next by Date: Re: requiring proper tail recursion
Prev by thread: addendum about informality and tail recursion
Next by thread: addendum about informality and tail recursion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread