Re: can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?

["Ozan S. Yigit" <oz@sis.yorku.ca>]

rozas writes, quoting the june 92 meeting report:

>   Brief discussions of three issues then yielded a consensus:
> 
>   Multiple values:  Dan Friedman stated that he understood the
>   motivations to be efficiency and a wish to hide representations.
>   The multiple values proposal was then adopted without objection.
> 
> I may very well have missed or forgotten something, but I don't recall
> anything of the form that you suggest.

if there is any concern as to the outcome of that discussion, and if anyone
can tell me the approximate time of it, i will be glad to go through the
tapes and transcribe the discussion for this group.

oz