[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: can (values) be the (an) unspecified value?
- From: Matthias Blume <blume@cs.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 1994 20:52:08 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <9402040131.AA21661@cs.Princeton.EDU> (message from Jonathan Rees on Thu, 3 Feb 94 20:21:49 -0500)
I'm sure I missed something (in fact, it must be a lot), but *I* was
under the impression, that the only continuations accepting other than
exactly one argument are those created by call-with-values.
This means, (begin (values) 1) is not a valid form.
I can see some pretty inconvenient implementation issues coming up
when we (i.e. you) allow too much here. (I'm still puzzled by the
question, why VALUES&Co. are such a good thing anyway, but this is
a different story ...)