Re: R5RS interpreters need not apply?

[kend@newton.apple.com (Ken Dickey)]

At  2:56 PM 93/04/06 -0400, Aubrey Jaffer wrote:

>Are the considerations of scheme interpreters no longer relevant to
>the authors? 

I for one do development interpretively and compile code when I know things
are right and long-term useful.  I would be *very* suprised if the above
turned out to be the case.


> R4RS was implementable in a small, fast program; The
>macro requirement of R5RS is not.

I don't believe this.


-Ken