[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

"is an error" -> "is undefined"

To: rrrs-authors@life.ai.mit.edu
Subject: "is an error" -> "is undefined"
From: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 89 15:01:55 EDT
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 25 Aug 89 14:51:00 -0400. <19890825185146.3.KMP@BOBOLINK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Posted-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 89 15:01:55 EDT
Posted-From: The MITRE Corp., Bedford, MA

>> From: ramsdell@linus.MITRE.ORG
...
>> If this proposal is not to your liking, please submit a replacement
>> paragraph which is consistant with the notation and terminology of
>> R3.95RS. 
>> 
>> John

I was wrong to be so restrictive.  Kent M Pitman is right about the
alternative possibility of you proposing new notation and terminology
to cover this case.  That is, maybe by replacing the phrase "is an
error" with "is undefined", and adding the appropriate definition of
"is undefined", we will have a proposal acceptable to all.

John

Follow-Ups:
- "is an error" -> "is undefined"
  - From: Guillermo J. Rozas <jinx@hpesogg.hp.com>

References:
- Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)
  - From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com>

Prev by Date: Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)
Next by Date: Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)
Prev by thread: Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)
Next by thread: "is an error" -> "is undefined"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread