[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)

To: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org
Subject: Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)
From: Guillermo J. Rozas <jinx@hpesogg.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 89 16:18:12 pdt
Cc: rrrs-authors@life.ai.mit.edu, ramsdell@linus.mitre.org
In-Reply-To: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org's message of Thu, 24 Aug 89 07:39:19 EDT <8908241139.AA10826@huxley.mitre.org>
Reply-To: jinx%hpesogg@sde.hp.com


    Values applied to one argument simply returns its argument.  Returning
    more than one value or zero values to something other than a receiving
    procedure is an error.

Isn't this saying that it is an error to return 2 values to an
implicit continuation?  If so, I don't like it.

References:
- Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)
  - From: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org

Prev by Date: Re: Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)
Next by Date: "is an error" -> "is undefined"
Prev by thread: Revised WITH-VALUES and VALUES (I think we are near agreement!)
Next by thread: Multiple values for R4RS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread