[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DO in Scheme

Morris Katz says:
``At the risk of pushing my luck, I would suggest that with the death of DO we
reintroduce named-let to at least optional status.''

Am I confused?  It looks to me that the named version of LET is still in the
language.  In fact, its description directly follows that of DO in R3RS.