[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: backquote proposal

To: JAR%mit-mc.arpa@csnet-relay.arpa, RRRS-AUTHORS%mit-mc.arpa@csnet-relay.arpa
Subject: Re: backquote proposal
From: David Bartley <Bartley%CSL60%ti-csl.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA>
Date: 20 Nov 1985 0943-CST
cc: Bartley%CSL60%ti-csl.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
In-Reply-To: Your message of 19-Nov-85 1712-CST

>From JAR:

 > I haven't heard any objection to the backquote proposal.  Unless
 > you guys reply soon, it will become part of the next edition of the
 > RRRS, and I'll complain when my programs don't run in your
 > implementations, so speak up.
 > ...
 > (Don't worry, I'll send out a proposed precise description
 > before a new edition of the RRRS happens.)

Is this tongue-in-cheek or are you suggesting/presuming another round
of ``standardization'' for Scheme?

David Bartley
-------

Prev by Date: backquote proposal
Next by Date: Re: backquote proposal
Prev by thread: backquote proposal
Next by thread: Re: backquote proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread