[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Windows NT vs. 95

To: thinkpad@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Windows NT vs. 95
From: "Eugene Fiume" <elf@aw.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 13:11:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: Axel Hartmann <axel.hartmann@stud.uni-karlsruhe.de> "holy war, was: Windows NT 3.5 on Thinkpad 701" (Sep 5, 11:31am)
References: <1.5.4.32.19960905153158.00669f28@129.13.95.1>

Sorry for the naive and slightly off-topic question (my standard
"I'm a UNIX bozo" apology).  To what extent, if any, are commercial
16 and 32 bit Windows '95 applications compliant with NT?

Eugene Fiume.

References:
- holy war, was: Windows NT 3.5 on Thinkpad 701
  - From: Axel Hartmann <axel.hartmann@stud.uni-karlsruhe.de>

Prev by Date: holy war, was: Windows NT 3.5 on Thinkpad 701
Next by Date: RE: Win95 Suspend lockup
Prev by thread: holy war, was: Windows NT 3.5 on Thinkpad 701
Next by thread: FYI: Prices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread