RE: Win95 or NT?

["Ronald Shaw" <Ron_Shaw@msn.com>]

I have a tp755, 12Meg.  One disk(540 with NT, another (810) with Win95.
Both 
work fine, except with 12Meg NT is very slow.  I mainly use my pad for

writting Visual C++ programs.  A program that compiles in 45 secs under Win95 
takes 1min 30 under NT.  Unless your have 24Meg or better I would recommend 
Win95, even then I suspect Win95 would be faster.


Dock1, CD-ROM drive, 
PCMICA modem all work fine with both

Ron_Shaw@msn.com

----------
From: 
	Skip Smith
Sent: 	Wednesday, September 06, 1995 12:01 PM
To: 	
tp750@CS.UTK.EDU
Subject: 	Win95 or NT?

Hi, I have a TP755CE and am 
considering moving from Win3.11 to much
overhyped Win95 or possibly NT. I 
see support from IBM for Win95 but
little if any acknowledgement of NT. I'd 
like to run NT as a
development environment, but don't want to sacrifice a 
lot of the
features of my thinkpad.

Does anyone have any experience 
running NT on a pad? Is there PCMCIA
and Docking Station support? Does Power 
Management work? Is there
MWAVE Modem and Sound support?  What are the 
gotchas?

My apologies if this is in a FAQ somewhere; any advice is 
appreciated.

Regards, Skip Smith