[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tail recursion proposal

To: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@research.nj.nec.com>
Subject: Re: tail recursion proposal
From: dak@sq.com
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 98 14:45:30 EST
Cc: rrrs-authors@martigny.ai.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Jan 1998 14:52:17 EST." <199801061952.OAA27741@kima.nj.nec.com>


| This is a proposal for an expanded statement of the tail-recursion
| requirement in R5RS.  It would be a new section.  The existing
| statement, a paragraph in the section on semantics (section 1.1),
| would remain.
| 
| It was written by John Ramsdell, Will Clinger, and myself following
| the discussion on this list.
| 
|                                    -Richard Kelsey

That's lovely, intuitive, and appealing.  Nice work, folks!

Best,
Dak
--
David A. 'Dak' Keldsen
Manager, Engineering East and Product Services
SoftQuad Inc.
Toronto, Canada

References:
- tail recursion proposal
  - From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@research.nj.nec.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Oversight in R^4RS: `@' as an ``extended alphabetic character''
Next by Date: Re: tail recursion proposal
Prev by thread: tail recursion proposal
Next by thread: Re: tail recursion proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread