[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: exception systems

To: blume@cs.Princeton.EDU, gjr@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: exception systems
From: "ozan s. yigit" <oz@nexus.yorku.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 14:49:46 -0400
Cc: rrrs-authors@mc.lcs.mit.edu

quick question unrelated to the general discussion:

i am not sure if i understand what the problem is with SML/NJ call/cc
implementation. are there more problems in implementing it for SML than
scheme or does SML require a different strategy with different tradeoffs?
[if i am missing the last word on this topic in scheme, please refresh my
memory. the last thing i read is dbyvig's one shot" paper, sorry.]

oz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: exception systems
  - From: "Guillermo J. Rozas" <gjr@martigny.ai.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: restarts and MI as possible omissions
Next by Date: Re: exception systems
Prev by thread: Re: exception systems
Next by thread: Re: exception systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread