[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dynamic binding, ballot
Will suggested that I send out another ballot concerning whether or not to
include dynamic binding, as described in a separate message (and in earlier
ones), in an appendix to R4RS. I include such a ballot below. Please send
your ballots to me before the new year. I will compile the results and
send them out at that time.
Pavel
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
|
| | I do not object to including a description of dynamic binding,
as |
| | defined in the recent message to RRRS-Authors, in an appendix to
|
| | R4RS.
|
| |
|
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
|
| | I do not object to including a description of dynamic binding,
|
| | similar to that in the recent message to RRRS-Authors, in an
|
| | appendix to R4RS as long as it reflects the changes I want.
|
| | A brief overview of my desired changes appears below this
ballot. |
| |
|
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
|
| | I object to including a description of dynamic binding, similar
|
| | to that in the recent message to RRRS-Authors, in an appendix to
|
| | R4RS.
|
| |
|
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
Additional comments: