[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

An alternate description of the multiple values proposal

To: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org
Subject: An alternate description of the multiple values proposal
From: cph (Chris Hanson)
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 89 16:31:46 edt
Cc: rrrs-authors@life.ai.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org's message of Fri, 01 Sep 89 09:08:45 EDT <8909011308.AA05558@huxley.mitre.org>

   From: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org
   Date: Fri, 01 Sep 89 09:08:45 EDT

   On naming BABY-DOE, I think we can assume that Pavel suggests
   CALL-WITH-VALUES and Chris Hanson suggests WITH-VALUES.

I've changed my mind.  I now agree with Pavel and prefer
`call-with-values'.

Follow-Ups:
- Name for BABY-DOE should not include "values".
  - From: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org

References:
- Re: An alternate description of the multiple values proposal
  - From: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org

Prev by Date: Re: An alternate description of the multiple values proposal
Next by Date: An alternate description of the multiple values proposal
Prev by thread: An alternate description of the multiple values proposal
Next by thread: Name for BABY-DOE should not include "values".
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread