Re: Multiple values

[ramsdell@linus.mitre.org]

>> From: Pavel.pa@xerox.com
...
>> -- At BASH, we decided that what has been called WITH-VALUES would be
>> better named CALL-WITH-VALUES, to be consistent with CALL-WITH-INPUT-FILE.
>> I still agree with this, but wouldn't hold up progress if others were
>> strongly opposed to this name.

I am quite willing to entertain suggestions for alternative names, but
how about waiting until after we get agreement on the basic proposal?

John

PS.  Sorry about the unbalanced parens in my last note.  The example
should be:

        (with-values 
          (lambda ()
	    (call-with-current-continuation
	      (lambda (k) 
		(k 1 2))))
	  cons)   	      =>              (1 . 2)