multiple values

[mkatz@sesame.stanford.edu (Morris Katz)]

   Date: Wed, 23 Aug 89 10:41:22 -0500
   From: R. Kent Dybvig <dyb@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
   Note that I'm not asking for a requirement that "(values e)" be
   distinct from "e", only that we not require that "(values e)" be
   the same as "e".  So it doesn't rule out an implementation that
   automatically truncates multiple values.

I must be missing something.  How does the requirement that "(values e)" and
"e" be the same rule out an implementation the automatically truncates? 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morry Katz
katz@polya.stanford.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------