[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Minutes from lunch 5 August 1986

To: willc%tekchips.tek.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
Subject: Re: Minutes from lunch 5 August 1986
From: Andy Freeman <ANDY@Sushi.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Thu 14 Aug 86 18:30:00-PDT
cc: rrrs-authors@MC.LCS.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <8608142000.AA24878@tekchips.TEK>

I'd be happier if the Scheme community said nothing about
multitasking, multiprocessing, or anything related to parallelism.
This isn't intended to discourage informal communication, but any hint
of agreement/standardization is premature.

Why is this coming up now anyway?  We don't understand macros, errors,
interrupts, declarations, etc.

I'd rather have (hash) tables than project/inject/in?.

-andy
-------

References:
- Minutes from lunch 5 August 1986
  - From: willc%tekchips.tek.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA

Prev by Date: Minutes from lunch 5 August 1986
Next by Date: substring indexes
Prev by thread: Minutes from lunch 5 August 1986
Next by thread: r-cubed syntax (nits)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread