[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
numeric predicates
Date: 24 Feb 1986 20:56 EST (Mon)
From: Bill Rozas <JINX%OZ.AI.MIT.EDU@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU>
How come we have 2 versions of every possible predicate (> and >?,
etc.)? It seems silly to me. Could we drop one of the two? Does
anybody feel strongly about this?
This is a good excuse for me to put in my two cents' worth, a few years
too late: I think that putting "?" in the names of all the predicates
is a TERRIBLE idea. Why? Because they make it much harder to read code
out loud. The "-P" convention is at least pronounceable, if visually
bizarre (but I would do away with that too if I could). I will not
entertain counterarguments of the form "But English uses `?' and not
`P'" because English does NOT lump the "?" in with the spelling of the
verb; it is a marker on the entire sentence.
--Guy
- Follow-Ups:
- P?
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA>