Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Fall Semester, 2010
MIT 6.805/STS085: Ethics and Law on the Electronic Frontier
Term papers
The major factor in your semester grade will be your term paper. You can work
alone or work with a partner (at most two people on a paper).
The paper should be a substantial piece of work. We're
expecting papers about 20 pages (one author) or 40 pages (2 authors),
but we're more interested in quality than in length.
For examples of the level of work you should aspire to, look at some
posted examples of 6.805 papers, particularly the papers from fall 2003,
2005, 2007, and 2008, which were by individuals or teams of two.
Research
We expect you to do thorough research on your topic, with several
references. News reports, webzine articles, and Wikipedia can be good
ways to get started, but make sure to not stop there: go to
primary sources. If you're doing anything even remotely about
legal issues, you should make sure to check out law review papers,
which can be search from MIT through
LexisNexis Academic Legal Reviews. You'll need to have MIT certificates installed in
your browser. And it really helps to interview people who are
directly involved with the topic you are writing about.
Topic
We'd like you to pick a topic related to what we're covering in the course.
But if there is something else related to Internet policy that you
feel passionate about, we'll consider approving that as a topic.
Picking a good topic is one of the hardest parts of writing paper for
this class. Often people start out by picking topics that are too
broad or too vague, or topics where they have no chance of making
original contributions. Look here for advice on choosing a topic.
Approach and Scope of Paper
We are certainly interested in your opinions and ideas. But you
should treat this paper as research and analysis, not just venting or
making unsubstantiated assertions. Even so, we do
expect you to have opinions and a point of view on your topic — not
just write a "book report" or a summary of what other people have
said.
Your paper should have a thesis, i.e., an idea, claim, or
argument that you are putting forward and defending in the paper. We
expect that your paper will start out by stating the thesis in the
first one or two paragraphs, and that you will proceed to support the
thesis in a focused and coherent way. If you are unclear on what we
mean by this, have a look at these notes from
the
Harvard Writing Center.
Paper grades will take into account both the quality of your ideas
and the quality of your writing. If you got feedback from the
short writing assignment suggesting that your writing needs
improvement, please take that advice seriously.
Be sure to back up your arguments with facts and by citing source
material. There is a tremendous amount of reference material
available on-line in the course archives and other places on the net.
If you cite unpublished on-line material, you can include citations or
links to the appropriate URLs in the bibliography.
Note: For citing material published on the Internet, list the URL followed by a
note that says "(visited XXX)" where XXX is the date that you last
visited the page. For an explanation of how to cite legal cases, see
Introduction to Basic Legal Citation
by Peter W. Martin of Cornell Law School. The easiest place to start
is in the example section (chapter 3).
Schedule
Here is the schedule of milestones for your paper, to help you plan.
More detailed information about each assignment will be posted as the
due dates come closer.
- Sept. 30 Proposal: Turn in a one-page description of the
issue you plan to investigate in your paper, and how you propose to go
about this. For example, who are you planning to talk to? What
sources do you plan to consult?
Shortly after this is submitted, you will have an individual meeting with
one of the staff to discuss your proposed topic.
- Oct. 14: Detailed plan: This is a refined and extended
version of the proposal. The plan must include your topic, a problem
statement (i.e. what is the issue this paper is addressing), the main
arguments and methods you plan to use to support your thesis, and list
at least six sources you are planning to use or some people you are
planning to contact and speak to. Try to have at least one primary
source — more would be better. Note that in order to have
even tentative arguments at this point, you must have already done
some significant work on your topic.
- Oct. 28:
Extended abstract: Turn in a few paragraphs that describe the issue or
problem/question you are addressing. Your thesis must be stated in
the first two paragraphs. Outline your arguments in support of your
thesis, and give at least six references (or people) that you have
consulted in doing your research. Notice that, in ourder to state
your thesis and the arguments, your research must be mostly finished
at this point.
- Nov. 24: Complete draft: Turn in a complete draft of the paper. This
should be a late-stage draft, with all sections written, and
needing only polish and revision in response to our feedback, which
we'll provide in order for you to do the final draft.
You should prepare your draft and upload it to the Stellar site. This
is due by 11:59PM Eastern Standard Time, November 24. There will be
no extensions.
- Dec. 9: Final papers due, turned in on the Stellar
site. Late papers will not be accepted.
Turning in the final paper
Turn in your finished paper on-line on the Stellar.
Make your paper a single document, not a collection
of linked documents. Actually upload the paper —
don't just put it up on a web page and tell us the URL.
Keep in mind that we require good quality writing. Papers with
spelling, grammatical, or stylistic errors will be penalized in
grading, or might even not be accepted. Good resources on writing are
The Mayfield
Handbook of Technical and Scientific Writing, by Les Perelman, Ed
Barrett, and Jim Paradis, and Grammar and Style
Notes by Jack Lynch.