Massachusetts Institute of Technology
MIT 6.805/6.806/STS085: Ethics and Law on the Electronic Frontier
Fall Semester, 2003
Week of class on September 4

Course Overview; Early Internet liability cases

The readings for this week (and every week) should be done before class, and you should come to class and prepared to discuss them. In class, we will call on participants and ask them to answer questions about the readings and to contribute to the discussion. The quality of class participation will be a factor in grades.

Also, in order to be admitted to the class, you must complete and turn in the pre-semester writing assignment. No one will be admitted to the class without having done the assignment.

Topic for today

We'll start with an overall introduction to the course, and a perspective for thinking about how technology and policy interact in affecting behavior in the world of the Internet. Then we'll learn how to read and brief a judicial opinion and look some early Internet cases involving defamation--the standards that determine liability, and who is liable.

Readings to do before class

Start by getting a brief background in First Amendment law:

Now turn to the Internet:

Pre-semester writing assignment

In order to be admitted to the class, you must complete and turn in a short writing assignment by Wednesday, Sept. 3. No one will be admitted to the class without having done the assignment.

To do after class today

There are two writing assignments due this week involving the rotisserie. One requires answering a question by Sunday and then posting a response to someone else's question by Wednesday. The other is a brief of Reno v. ACLU:
  1. Register for the writing rotisserie after class today. There will be a question posted Friday at noon, and the first part is due Sunday night. The second part (commenting on someone else's answer) is due Wednesday.

  2. Please write (and submit using the rotisserie) a brief of Reno v. ACLU, which is in the readings for next week. As Danny explained in class, this should cover:
    1. the issue before the Court
    2. the procedural history of the case
    3. the facts of the case
    4. the Court's holdings
    5. the Court's reasoning
    Your answer should be short - a page at most. For this question (unlike the one above) we won't ask you to comment on anyone else's answer. Your brief is due on Wednesday.

Remember that the each week's readings are to be done before lecture. Check out next week's reading assignments a couple of days before class.