**************************************************************** aileen graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : aileen graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 15:47:15 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object! Very cute. The only little problem I found was that you advertise a "-hatspeed" parameter in your help message, but when that parameter is included, I get an "unrecognized arg" message. It's a relatively small thing, though. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** akasha graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : akasha graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 16:15:05 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: You've got a nice idea for an object, but there are a few little problems with it. First of all, the rotation is wrong. The object should have been modeled with +Z as the up vector. You have +Y as the up vector. Second, I think you could have put a lot more detail into this object. One of the grading criteria, as you see above, is complexity - how much time did you spend on the object, how detailed is it? I think there are a lot of extra little details you could have put in, but didn't. It looks after all as if you have one base castle object, onto which you add a few turrets etc. None of the parameters really change the object all that much. And third, there are a few parts of your model which I think are a little rough. For example, the corners of the castle don't line up all that well (I think you used a cone to smooth out each corner of the case (when seen without turrets) but the cones are not really placed that precisely. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** asundqui graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : asundqui graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 16:32:18 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Great object! Well modeled and very well parameterized. The only little problem I saw with it was that for some of the parameters it was not clear what range of values that parameter could take. Also, the "ridges" parameter does not seem to working quite right -- I didn't see any change from "-ridges 1" to "-ridges 10". Other than that, great job! Mmm, I'm hungry... -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** asundqui graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : asundqui graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 16:32:18 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Great object! Well modeled and very well parameterized. The only little problem I saw with it was that for some of the parameters it was not clear what range of values that parameter could take. Also, the "ridges" parameter does not seem to working quite right -- I didn't see any change from "-ridges 1" to "-ridges 10". Other than that, great job! Mmm, I'm hungry... -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** awchau graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : awchau graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 16:46:15 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: I like your bomber -- real cute. Just two little problems: First, your rotation is off. +Z should be the up vector (you have +Y). Second, I don't know about your -scale parameter. The idea is that whatever your program outputs, it should always fit with a box of size 1 1 1. So it really does not make much sense to have a scale parameter -- either you normalize the effect of the scale away, or you violate the dimension constraints. Other than that, good job! -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** ayyang graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : ayyang graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 16:54:12 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: I like your model. The only reason I took off one point is that I think that the model could have been made a lot more detailed. We have a complexity criterion for grading, as you see above, and that is supposed to be a general indicator of how much attention went into modeling the object. Maybe the object would have been improved if you had added a cockpit or something like that. By the way, don't the rear propellers on a helicopter usually rotate on a vertical plane? -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** ayyang graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : ayyang graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 16:54:12 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: I like your model. There are just two little problems: First, both your scale and rotations are off. The helicopter is much larger than a unit cube. And you have the helicopter upside down -- you have -Z as the up vector! Second, I think that the model could have been made a lot more detailed. We have a complexity criterion for grading, as you see above, and that is supposed to be a general indicator of how much attention went into modeling the object. Maybe the object would have been improved if you had added a cockpit or something like that. By the way, don't the rear propellers on a helicopter usually rotate on a vertical plane? -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** badger graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : badger graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 17:05:51 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Great object, man. Super-cute and well-parameterized what's more. The only thing: you got the scale messed up. The idea is supposed to be that whatever object you output it should fit inside the unit cube at the origin. A lot of your snakes not only did not fit in the unit cube, but they also weren't at the origin. Other than, it's all good. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** bdunn graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : bdunn graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 17:18:56 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Cool object! Nice precision modeling. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** benchun graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : benchun graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 17:33:24 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: A very nice object, very detailed, but it lacks two types of parameters: discrete and material. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** benres graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : benres graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 17:41:22 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** brianlin graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : brianlin graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 17:51:51 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** brians graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : brians graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 17:58:57 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Yikes, I think your object needs a lot of work: * It produces invalid Inventor code for the case where the "-cone" parameter is set to 2.0 It violates the unit-cube size constraint in many case. The idea is that your program should output an object of the correct dimensions no matter what the arguments. * Your fins are nice, but with inventor culling back-facing polygon by default, half of them don't appear at any time. What you should have done is place 2 polygons in each position, with normals facing in opposite directions. * It's not very detailed at all. We have a "complexity" criterion for grading this problem set because we wanted people to model objects in some detail. In your case, I think you just slapped a cone on top of a cyclinder. You probably could have gone a little farther than that. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** bwallis graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : bwallis graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 18:12:27 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Awesome object! I love it! I love the subtle effects, like the breathing rate. Unfortunately, you lost some points on your parameters -- the idea was that the user could invoke your program with a series of continues, material etc. parameters. You've collapsed them all down to discrete parameters, even though it seems like it would not have been too hard to change some of them to continuous parameters. Breathing rate, for example, should be a continuous variable from 0 (not breathing) to whatever. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** awchau graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : awchau graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 16:46:15 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: I like your bomber -- real cute. Just one little problem: your rotation is off. +Z should be the up vector (you have +Y). Other than that, good job! -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** cda graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : cda graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 18:24:26 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Your car could use a lot more detail. Also: the problem set clearly states that your program should accept one of each type of parameter. However, you seem to missing a discrete parameter and a continuous parameter (the color parameters count as material parameters only). -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** bwallis graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : bwallis graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 18:12:27 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- DOCKED 1 LETTER GRADE FOR NOT FOLLOWING NAMING CONVENTION documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Awesome object! I love it! I love the subtle effects, like the breathing rate. Unfortunately, you lost some points on your parameters -- the idea was that the user could invoke your program with a series of continues, material etc. parameters. You've collapsed them all down to discrete parameters, even though it seems like it would not have been too hard to change some of them to continuous parameters. Breathing rate, for example, should be a continuous variable from 0 (not breathing) to whatever. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** charlesl graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : charlesl graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 18:42:55 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- DOCKED 1 LETTER GRADE FOR NOT FOLLOWING NAMING CONVENTION documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 5 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Charles, your object needs a lot of work. Your object looks nothing like a house -- the idea was to model something recognizable and to do it in some amount of detail. You can't just slap some cylinders between two boxes and call it a house. You see how much work other student put into their objects. Also, your program should output a default object when invoked with no parameters. Your program does not seem to output an ojbect unless the "-filenum" parameter is specified. Also, you did not respect the scale constraint - your object should have fit inside a unit cube at the origin. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** chungfat graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : chungfat graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 18:58:28 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Good job, Neil! -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** cjcheng graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : cjcheng graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 19:03:51 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object! Very clean model. Just a few small problems: * There's a radius parameter specified in the help message, however, fiddling with the parameter never changed anything in the model visibly. * stageheight seems to have some kind of lower bound (I think if I go under 1.0 it restores the stageheight to the default). However this bound is not reflected in the documentation. * You did not respect the scale constraint. Your object should fit inside a unit cube at the origin. Other than that, nice job! -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** ctalbott graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : ctalbott graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 19:16:11 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Awesome! Great object with great detail at the higher recurse levels. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** cuijian graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : cuijian graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 19:30:12 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** cuijian graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : cuijian graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 19:30:12 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: A good object, but less detailed than it could have been. Your parameters were not very expressive. In fact, you really don't have a continuous parameter in there. You listed the tree color as your continuous parameter, but that's really a material parameter, because it's not changing the geometry of the scene at all. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** cyoon graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : cyoon graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 23:15:43 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** cyoon graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : cyoon graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 23:15:43 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** cuijian graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : cuijian graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 19:30:12 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: A good object, but less detailed than it could have been. Your parameters were not very expressive. In fact, you really don't have a continuous parameter in there. You listed the tree color as your continuous parameter, but that's really a material parameter, because it's not changing the geometry of the scene at all. Also, you did not obey the scale and rotation constraints. Your scene does not fit inside a unit cube and you have not modeled +Z as the up vector. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** davidz graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : davidz graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 23:24:12 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2.5 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9.5 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Cool object! And I like the parameters that you added -- lot's of freedom there. The only little mistake: you did not obey the scale and rotation constraints. i.e. your object does not fit inside a unit cube at the origin, and you have not modeled the +Z vector as up. Other than that, great job! -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** dchen graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : dchen graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 23:59:35 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2.5 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9.5 extra credit (0-2): 2 -------------------------------------------- notes: Wow! You put a hell of a lot of work into this, obviously. It came out great! The only little nit I can pick is that you didn't obey the scaling convention. Well I think you'll find that mistake to be a costly one: it brings you ALL THE WAY down to 11.5/10 -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** delfin graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : delfin graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 0:21:38 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** dewb graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : dewb graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 0:29:31 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- DOCKED 1 PT: DID NOT FOLLOW NAMING CONVENTION DOCKED 1 PT: USED 3D MODELER documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: You're being docked two points for not following the naming convention that we specified, and for either using a 3d modeler or using a stock model from some other place. The point of the assignment was to do your own modeling. Also, you needed a discrete variable, and candy seemed to be it, although I could not see any visible difference when the value of candy was varied (I never saw any candies, actually). -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** dmaze graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : dmaze graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 0:34:29 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Good job. A nice model, though a little on the simple side. You had two little problems: first, your object does not quite fit in the unit cube at the origin (it's offset from the origin) and second, your program outputs invalid inventor code for "-height" values above a certain amount (e.g. 200) -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** dsnow graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : dsnow graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 0:43:16 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Yikes! There's something wrong with your program, I think, because I cannot get the recursive robots going. Every time that I run your program with "-ramp" set, it produces invalid Inventor code. not unit cube missing continuous parameter -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** emarcus graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : emarcus graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 1:05:10 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** emliu graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : emliu graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 1:25:09 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2.5 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9.5 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Great object! Your parameterizations are super-expressive -- you can create a wide range of object with your program. Your one little problem was that your object did not usually fit into the unit cube at the origin. But that's not a huge deal. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** emliu graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : emliu graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 1:25:09 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Great object! Your parameterizations are super-expressive -- you can create a wide range of object with your program. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** fdabek graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : fdabek graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 1:33:52 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Great object. Well-chosen parameters. Compelling output. Just what a TA likes to see. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** flaspa graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : flaspa graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 1:45:15 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object! Great animation. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** franco graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : franco graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 1:53:57 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: You chose an odd color scheme, which made the object look unshaded, losing a lot of detail. Also, you did not obey the scale constraint. Your object should fit inside a unit cube at the origin. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** gozar graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : gozar graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 2:07:10 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 1.5 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8.5 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Good job on what I suspect will be a very useful object. The only little problem you had was that you needed a discrete parameter in there. Also, the program produces invalid code for text with spaces in it. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** markman graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : markman graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:09:24 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** low graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : low graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:12:34 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** liberal graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : liberal graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:14:28 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** leeying graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : leeying graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:17:26 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** kwi graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : kwi graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:19:42 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** markman graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : markman graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:09:24 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 0 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: You do not have documentation for the -help command. Your object is rather simple and there is a limited range of parameters. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** low graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : low graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:12:34 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your object is really nice. The only drawback is that you horribly violate our requirement that the object displays at ~5Hz. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** liberal graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : liberal graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:14:28 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 0 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): -1 -------------------------------------------- notes: This one is hard to grade since I believe you have pretty much ignored all the instructions. You implemented in java, you did not submit 4 iv examples and you don't have the required documentation. The -1 was due to not following naming conventions and not submitting sufficient examples. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** leeying graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : leeying graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:17:26 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your object is cute. You have four parameters, but none of them are continuous as specified in the handout. Also, your object is a little simple. There are a lot of little details you could have added. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** kulkarni graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : kulkarni graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:46:08 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** kulkarni graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : kulkarni graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:46:08 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your object is good, but -help does not generate a help message. Also, the up vector should be +Z, not +Y. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** ktkohl graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : ktkohl graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:48:34 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** ktkohl graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : ktkohl graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:48:34 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object. The only problem is that -help does not generate a help message. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** kwi graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : kwi graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:19:42 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object. A little more detail would have pushed you over the edge. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** kdmc graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : kdmc graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:53:29 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object, but some more detail would have been nice. -help does not generate a help message. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** karinc graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : karinc graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:55:48 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** kaechyc graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : kaechyc graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:56:50 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object. -help does not generate a help message. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jso graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jso graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 15:58:43 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your object is quite simple. Spending some more time on creating detail would have been nice. You have a quite limited range of paprameters. While covering the basics, it is hard to create a wide range of objects using the parameters specified. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jpelly graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jpelly graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:01:34 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): -1 -------------------------------------------- notes: You were docked one point for not submitting example iv files. -help does not generate a help message. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jpearce graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jpearce graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:03:48 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** joycelin graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : joycelin graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:06:03 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice job. A little more detail would have pushed you up another grade. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jnye graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jnye graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:08:00 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice job. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jmlaszlo graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jmlaszlo graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:10:15 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: You do not specify a material parameter. Also, this is a very simple object. Some more time spent on detail would have improved the assignment greatly. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jkent graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jkent graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:12:40 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 1 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: You completed the assignment OK, but your object is very simple. Some time spent constructing a more complex object/adding detail would have led to better results. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jjlilley graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jjlilley graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:18:43 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 2 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object and well chosen parameters. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jingq graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jingq graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:20:27 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object. The only drawback was that none of the parameters changed the appearance of the shuttle much except for color. Overall a very good job. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jialun graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jialun graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:22:52 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your object is fairly simple. Some more time adding detail would have been nice. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jhhuang graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jhhuang graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:29:52 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object and good parameters. You were docked one point for not following the naming instructions for your turned in files. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jeffshel graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jeffshel graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:32:13 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object and good range of parameters. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jee graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jee graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:33:40 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice job. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jaw2s graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jaw2s graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:35:49 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice job. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** jar graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : jar graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:38:06 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object, but as you said it displays slower than 5Hz. Also, when given the argument -, your program executes the default instead of listing the arguments. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** ira graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : ira graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:42:02 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object. -help does not print out a help message. Otherwise solid. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** ibkaplan graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : ibkaplan graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:44:22 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object. For that little extra you could have parameterized some other aspect of the body, e.g. height. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** hongjy graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : hongjy graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:46:47 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object, but somewhat simple. Some time adding detail would be nice. Good variety of parameters. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** hhwang graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : hhwang graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:49:11 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): - -------------------------------------------- notes: Very good job. Nice parameterization. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** henryw graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : henryw graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:50:43 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 1 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: This object is too simple. Also, you have no continuous parameter specified (color count as a material parameter). -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** gromit graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : gromit graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:54:02 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object. The only question that remains now is why I would want to model a transparent gromit? -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** greenie graded by Kari Anne Kjolaas-------------------------------------------- student : greenie graded by : Kari Anne Kjolaas time : Mon Oct 11 16:56:03 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: The parameterization of your object is good, but I miss some more detail. Some more time spent on modelling would have been nice. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** mattlee graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : mattlee graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:18:50 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: You got docked a point for not turning in your executable as instructed -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** mattlee graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : mattlee graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:18:50 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): complexity (0-4): technical versatility (0-3): exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: You got docked a point for not turning in your executable as instructed -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** mattlee graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : mattlee graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:18:50 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Cool water guns! You were docked a point for not turning in your executable as instructed. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** mburu graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : mburu graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:47:44 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your documentation is not good enough. You need to describe what your scene is. You could have had a more complex continuous parameter... scaling is too simple. Also, your object does not fit into a unit cube. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** meeroh graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : meeroh graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:53:22 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: You need to have better documentation about what your object is. You also did not follow instructions. The object must fit in a unit cube centered at the origin. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** minneyar graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : minneyar graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:58:51 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): .5 total (0-10): 7.5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: The only problem with your object is that it is too simple. Also, your object is a little bit outside the unit cube but that's no big deal. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** mmaa graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : mmaa graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:07:10 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): .5 total (0-10): 9.5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: The only problem is that your object does not always fit in the unit cude, but that's no big deal. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** minneyar graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : minneyar graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:58:51 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): .5 total (0-10): 7.5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: The only problem with your object is that it is too simple. Also, your object is a little bit outside the unit cube but that's no big deal. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** meeroh graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : meeroh graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:53:22 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: You need to have better documentation about what your object is. You also did not follow instructions. The object must fit in a unit cube centered at the origin. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** mburu graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : mburu graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:47:44 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 6 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your documentation is not good enough. You need to describe what your scene is. You could have had a more complex continuous parameter... scaling is too simple. Also, your object does not fit into a unit cube. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** mattlee graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : mattlee graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 1:18:50 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Cool water guns! You were docked a point for not turning in your executable as instructed. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** nataraja graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : nataraja graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:12:33 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0.5 total (0-10): 8.5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Neat flower. Your program needs to output a default iv file if you run it with no arguments. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** nilesh graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : nilesh graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:15:05 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Neat! Big ice cream fan, huh? The only problem is that you didn't make it fit in a unit cube. so your fellow classmates probably had a hard time including your object into their scenes. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** ninghai graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : ninghai graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:21:30 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your executable needs to produce a default iv file to standard out if no arguments are passed in. This way, you can easily run your program and pipe it to any file you want. Also, your object does not fit in a unit cube. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** om_p graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : om_p graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:33:41 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Neat! Good job. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** peggykuo graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : peggykuo graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:36:34 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Very cute! Just a few comments: You documentation needs to describe what kind of object you are creating. Your program should output to the standard output rather than the file 'peggykuo_snoopy.7.iv' This way users can easily name it anything they want by piping the output to their file. Also, your object does not fit inside the unit cube. --------------------------------------------**************************************************************** prettig graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : prettig graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:44:06 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Neat looking! A few comments: You need some sort of continuous parameter. Something that is controlled by a floating point number. Your object needs to centered at the origin. I needs to fit in a unit cube (centered at the origin). -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** rdror graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : rdror graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:47:41 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3.5 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9.5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Good job! It's really nice that you provide plenty of parameters to the user. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** rpwang graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : rpwang graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:51:18 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: A few comments: Your object could be more complex. Your program should output to the standard output rather than the file 'rpwang_ceiling.1.iv' This way users can easily name it anything they want by piping the output to their file. Also, your object does not fit inside the unit cube and is not oriented correctly. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** rwsu graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : rwsu graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:54:56 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3.5 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9.5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very neat! Good job! -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** shishir graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : shishir graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 2:57:15 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): .5 total (0-10): 9.5 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very cool! Especially the -blackjack option. I docked half a point b/c your object does not fit inside a unit cube, but it's no big deal. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** sirkin graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : sirkin graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:01:51 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3.5 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): .5 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very neat realistic model of the lamp! The only problem is that it doesn't fit neatly into a unit cube, but that's no big deal. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** sirkin graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : sirkin graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:01:51 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): .5 total (0-10): 8.5 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very neat realistic model of the lamp! The only problem is that you don't provide a good existence parameter. You could have easily give the user the option to decide whether or not they want a light switch. or even if they want the light switch on the base. Also, it doesn't fit neatly into a unit cube, but that's no big deal. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** smeaton graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : smeaton graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:09:06 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0.5 total (0-10): 8.5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Neat looking temple! Especially the colored one. The only problem is that it does not quite fit inside a unit cube. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** snoeren graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : snoeren graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:12:43 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very neat! Too bad you did not draw the whole table. Your object would be more useful, if you had drawn the whole foosball table. Also, your object does not fit inside a unit cube and the up vector is also incorrect. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** sriram graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : sriram graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:16:02 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3.5 technical versatility (0-3): 2.5 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Good job! It's great that you can use your program to produce a great variety of chairs. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** stanhu graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : stanhu graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:18:38 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 3.5 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 7.5 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very neat! I love your Mastercard ad. :) A few comments: Your docs do not specify what kind of objects your program produces. Also, the objects need to fit in a unit cube. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** sverdlov graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : sverdlov graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:22:39 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1.5 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 8.5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Neat object! Few comments: Your documentation need to describe how your program can be called. It is not clear how to add custom arrows. Your object doesn't quite fit the unit cube. You should have made your program output to standard out. This way students can run it and pipe to whatever file they want. No big deal. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** tkburian graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : tkburian graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:27:07 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2.5 exactitude (0-1): 0.5 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: A few comments: Your should have provided more control of your pbject to the user. For example, it shouldn't be hard to let the user decide how big of a tree they want. (i.e. How many cones) Your documentation does not specify what kind of objects your program creates. Your object does not fit in the unit cube. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** treacle graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : treacle graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:33:40 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 0 complexity (0-4): 0 technical versatility (0-3): 0 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 0 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Did you turn in your assignment3? -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** val graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : val graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:34:36 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Awesome! Very detailed. Good job! -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** vbunny graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : vbunny graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:36:53 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0.5 total (0-10): 9.5 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Neat! Very cool. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** vedam graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : vedam graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:42:22 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 0 complexity (0-4): 0 technical versatility (0-3): 0 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 0 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Did you turnin anything? -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** wang066 graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : wang066 graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:43:01 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Neat! Very cool. The only problem is that the object does not fit inside a unit cude and your up vector is not correct. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** wbeebee graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : wbeebee graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:46:29 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Awesome! Very detailed. Good job! -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** yanhao graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : yanhao graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:48:05 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3.5 technical versatility (0-3): 2.5 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very neat! Looks exactly like my halogen lamp. A few comments: You should have made your program output to standard out as oppose to a file. This way students can run your program and pipe it to whatever file they want. Your up vector is incorrect. If your object loads up correctly in ivview, that means you have it wrong. This is because ivview has the +Z axis point out towards you. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** yipal graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : yipal graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:51:31 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): 1 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very cool! Good job in making it detailed and realistic. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** yipal graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : yipal graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:51:31 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Very cool! Good job in making it detailed and realistic. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** yusui graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : yusui graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 3:53:42 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 1 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 3 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: I don't understand what you created here. You've set it up so that I can't even move around to look at your object. And your documentation does not explain what it is your are trying to create. It seems like you did not put in much effort. If you think you deserve a better grade, talk to me, and tell me why. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** zwarren graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : zwarren graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 4:02:58 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 1 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 5 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Your object needs some improvements... here are some comments: Your documentation needs to specify what kind of object you are creating. Your scene is not complex enough. Where is your discrete parameter? Also, your object does not fit into a unit cube. And the up vector is not correct. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** zxf graded by Charles Lee-------------------------------------------- student : zxf graded by : Charles Lee time : Tue Oct 12 4:06:55 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 3 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: Not bad, but it is not very complex. It meets the minumum requirements, but you could have spent more time on it and made it much more impressive. Your object does not fit into a unit cube. And the up vector is not correct. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** benres graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : benres graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 17:41:22 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- DOCKED 1 PT. FOR TURNIN ERRORS documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Robot with a crown ... of course! You got docked one point because you did not turn in 4 example iv files, as the assignment handout specified. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** brianlin graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : brianlin graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 17:51:51 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 10 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Good job! Nice mog models, with plenty of parameters. You went outside the unit cube, but your warned of that in your help message. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** delfin graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : delfin graded by : Damian Isla time : Mon Oct 11 0:21:38 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- DOCKED 1 PT. FOR TEXTURE ERROR documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object, but since you handed it in initially wrong, I have to dock you 1 point. 9/10 is still great. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** draco graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : draco graded by : Damian Isla time : Fri Oct 15 16:03:41 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Nice object! Very well done. One little bug: when you make solid glasses, back-facing polygons are culled, meaning that the far side of the glass is invisible. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** dsnow graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : dsnow graded by : Damian Isla time : Fri Oct 15 16:33:18 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 1 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 8 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: I liked your object a lot. However there were a few problems with it. First, it produces invalid inventor code for the case where "-alien" is set without "-ramp". Also, your program should return a default object when run without parameters. Your code produces something, but it is invalid inventor code. You're also missing a continuous paramter (you had color, but that counts as a material parameter -- continuous parameters should change the geometry somehow). -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** emarcus graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : emarcus graded by : Damian Isla time : Fri Oct 15 16:41:13 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 0 technical versatility (0-3): 0 exactitude (0-1): 0 total (0-10): 2 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: The program doesn't seem to work. Either it produces code which displays nothing (if invoked without parameters) or it produces invalid code. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** cyoon graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : cyoon graded by : Damian Isla time : Sun Oct 10 23:15:43 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 4 technical versatility (0-3): 2 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 9 extra credit (0-2): -------------------------------------------- notes: Very nice object! Very precise, and I like the scads of parameters you included. You had one technical problem, which is that we are viewing your object off of the Athena file system, and so do not have access to the files which you link to in your output. Your "-primitive" parameter should avoid any problems (because ivview just doesn't show anything if it comes across an unsatisfied link) but even when "-primitive Cube" was specified, you still had some reference to the yellow pig model somewhere in your code. -------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** treacle graded by Damian Isla-------------------------------------------- student : treacle graded by : Charles Lee and Damian Isla time : Tue Oct 12 3:33:40 EDT 1999 problem set: asst3 -------------------------------------------- File viewed: -------------------------------------------- -1 PT: LATE TURNIN documentation (0-2): 2 complexity (0-4): 2 technical versatility (0-3): 3 exactitude (0-1): 1 total (0-10): 7 extra credit (0-2): 0 -------------------------------------------- notes: A simple object - good, but you are lacking one type of parameter, which is the discrete parameter (a parameter which takes on the values of the integers ...) Also your parameters are not really optimal. After all, the -longsword and -lightsaber parameters are in conflict. Maybe a single -bladeshape parameter might have been better? --------------------------------------------