In pursuit of what the patient thinks healthiness is and integrating that into the overall healthcare process, I ...
present a graphic representation that helps ascertain the commonality between the universe of discourse for the patient and the universe of discourse for the physician, and relations between objects in each universe,
use this graphic representation to reveal some of the actual objects and relations found with some preliminary analysis of their incidence,
discuss plans for proceeding from this point.
One step in effective medical decision making would be the ascertaining of the objects and the relations between those objects in each of the patient's and physician's universe of discourse for making medical decisions.
Promise:
In the course of this presentation, I present a strategy that will help you to be a better listener in one-on-one communication.
Strategy: Elicit Terms, Generate Objects, Elicit Relations, Generate an Interpretation, Test.
1) Elicit the speaker's terms and ...
2) with them generate a temporary understanding of the terms with their concomittant counterparts.
3) Use these constructs to ask questions that enable you to understand the relationships between the constructs.
4) capture those relations (temporarily) and use them to ...
5) test your understanding of the speaker by using the constructs and relations in a fashion that confirms your understanding.
Bring the patient and physician to a better understanding by facilitation - help them toward a common "universe of discourse" and establish a common "relation basis set" and thus a common conceptualization of the world.
What is not my goal:
...formalism first and foremost. I do not seek models or theory that are a set of logical expressions, "sentences", that are satisfied by any and all Interpretations.
identify objects in patient's universe of discourse
identify the terms used in the patient's Interpretation
identify relations in patient's Conceptualization
identify objects in physician's universe of discourse
identify the terms used in the physician's Interpretation
identify relations in physician's Conceptualization
identify common conceptualizations that have different names employed to describe objects and/or relations
identify inconsistencies and incompleteness in need of resolution (medical consequences are highly likely to expose incompleteness in the patient's anticipatory capacities)
communicate findings to physician - Herbert Stoylan's formalizations?
communicate findings to patient - patient as an expert => Herbert Stoylan's formalizations?
resolve deficiencies and differences
Only the first two subgoals are part of the current discussion.
Speculation based upon observation
Until a person making a statement feels they have been understood, they are not inclined to listen.
Computer user parallel: Until a person is confident that the machine can perform as they currently do, they are not inclined to trust it to do anything else.
This is the proposed graphic representation of a generic bipolar construct (constellatory to healthy/unheathy) with a generic subordinate construct for each pole.
Software
Omnigrid
is an example of current Repertory grid software.
- current analytical measures - uncertainty, salience, element distance.
- Scalar constructs allow correlation indices like Pearson correlation coef.
Data of frequency in the constructs collected thus far
- graphs from first 28 interviews
- implication - four forms or subtypes
Hinkle's four quadrants:
Parallel
Reciprocal
Orthogonal
Implicative Dilemma
- subsets: subordinate, superordinate and constellatory
Venn diagrams
subsumes not same as implication
- cause/effect
- examples: trees
- marked/unmarked
- positive/negative
- implication: four forms or subtypes
Golden Section Ratio hypothesis
- nominative
- prototypic constructs
- three axis of trait structure evaluation (good/bad), potency (strong/weak), activity (passive/active)
OF PARTICULAR INTEREST TO THE MEDICAL DOMAIN
- things over which patient has control vs no control, eg. Youth/older (A FORM OF CAUSE vs. AN EFFECT OF POOR HEALTH)
What does it mean to say, "_____ is healthy" or "_____is unhealthy"? Is that implication, ... cause?
How to terminate interview? Exhaustive approach so far
Dynamic list of constructs
- Fixed list in classical Repertory Grid
- could add to list as necessary
- Use large oversized list with instructions to only use those necessary
- Additionally at interview's end, could query adequacy of list and let this addition be selectively utilized
- presumption: no one interviewed previously would have used this addtion else they would have felt the need to add it
What are and what can we do with results?
Examples of potential interaction with Decision Analysis Trees:
Compare outcomes of recent decision analysis trees from CDM [NEMC] consults on temporal arteritis and Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) risk analysis with a constructus image.
Recent Temporal Arteritis decision tree consultation at NEMC:
Options were no treatment, steroidal Rx w/ risk of cardiac event, rebiopsy
Outcomes were survival or death, survival further subdivided into monocular vision loss and binocular vision loss.
Could ask: "How does monocular vision loss effect each item viewed important by the patient by the constructs elicited? How does binocular vision loss effect each item viewed important by the patient by the constructs elicited? How does survival impact each? How does death impact each?"
HRT - list of outcomes considered in the impact of progestin/estrogen therapy were limited to cancer risk (breast and endometrial), coronary heart disease and osteoporosis. The units of comparison were QALE (Quality Adjusted Life Expectancy) years. Women with all but the highest number of risk factors for breast cancer with no risk factors for coronary heart disease would be the only ones who could not expect an extended life expectancy. Limitations sited included the weakness of quality of life considerations.
These conclusions could be made more relevant to the individual by considering the interaction of any or all elements of the patient's constructs with the either the diseases or the medication considered. The space of potential ramifications would be a subset of the cartesian product of (diseases & medications X construct elements). What does each symptom say about each item of importance revealed by the constructus? What does breast or endometrial cancer, and potential reconstruction say about each item of importance revealed by the constructus? What does reproductive tract cancer, resection, and potential reconstruction say about each item of importance revealed by the constructus? How might hormone therapy effect the things important to the patient? How will things important to the patient affect the efficacy of the treatment so as to assure the predictive fit of this analysis. This is admittedly an extension of the study's complexity that should be a study in its own right, however, the point here is relevance. The opportunity to increase the granuarity of consideration by a finite number of pertinent parameters exists as a result of acquiring these constructs by which the patient discriminates healthy from unhealthy.
Subject1 - subset subordinate
Subject2 - unexpected construct: genuine honest / phoney
Subject3 - because-of, cause-of chain: healthy/younger/hienergy; good study in direction of implication and contrast of implication/causative
Subject4 - reciprocal w/o causation relation: direction/confused desires, pos movement/rutt. This one has ds., stress and positive direction all together. Example of "*something* is healthy" and the problem with deciding causality
Subject5 - classic, 6 most common constructs in one person; reciprocal "happy/stressed" ; eg of "more" in both poles
Subject7 - "Healther outlook" has seven explanatory children, eg. "Spiritual" constructs
Subject8 - spiritually grounded
Subject9 - multiple contrasts for same emergent pole and multiple emergent poles for same contrasts
Subject10 - Red cheeks/outdoor activities, good example of effects as well as causes in constructus
Subject11 - has marked spiritual constructs
Subject12 - has numerous reciprocal relationships between constructs, 5 or so are not clearly reciprocating relations between both poles.
Subject13 - is a good example of "not" => marked/unmarked and "more/less" => scalar