[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Purify'd scheme(s) -- a contribution to the `GEL = SCM + RMS' debate
In article <BLUME.94Oct26174954@aleph.cs.princeton.edu> blume@aleph.cs.princeton.edu (Matthias Blume -- that's me) wrote:
CPSTAK : Finished scm (11492 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
CTAK : Finished scm (1724633 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
DERIV : Finished scm (14834 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
DIV-ITER: Finished scm (47766 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
DIV-REC : Finished scm (7169 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
FFT : Finished scm ( 0 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
FPRINT : Finished scm ( 0 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
FREAD : Finished scm (1951 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
TAK : Finished scm (10104 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
TAKL : Finished scm (78712 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
TAKR : Finished scm (13992 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
(no typos -- I used cut&paste from the Purify window...)
Of course, there was a typo -- in the labels. I only use cut&paste
for the numbers and added the labels by hand. DIV-ITER and DIV-REC
are two benchmarks, but SCM runs only once to execute both. PUZZLE is
missing. Here is the correct table:
CPSTAK: Finished scm (11492 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
CTAK : Finished scm (1724633 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
DERIV : Finished scm (14834 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
DIV : Finished scm (47766 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
FFT : Finished scm (7169 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
FPRINT: Finished scm ( 0 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
FREAD : Finished scm ( 0 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
PUZZLE: Finished scm (1951 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
TAK : Finished scm (10104 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
TAKL : Finished scm (78712 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
TAKR : Finished scm (13992 errors, 0 leaked bytes)
Sorry about that