[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

redefining keywords I'm not doing a good job

To: rrrs-authors@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: redefining keywords I'm not doing a good job
From: "Aubrey Jaffer" <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 93 13:59:05 -0500
In-Reply-To: Jonathan Rees's message of Fri, 19 Mar 93 13:35:27 -0500 <9303191835.AA03923@kama.cs.cornell.edu>

   Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 14:59:26 -0500
   From: "Aubrey Jaffer" <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>

   In the first column of the Macro Appendix is the claim "With this
   extension, there are no reserved identifiers."  This seems ridiculous!

I retract my earlier comment.

While any implementation must have some sort of reserved identifiers
at a low level, these can be hidden from the user.  Thanks to A.
Bawden for pointing this out.

References:
- redefining keywords I'm not doing a good job
  - From: jar@cs.cornell.edu (Jonathan Rees)

Prev by Date: Re: multiple values proposal
Next by Date: R5RS interpreters need not apply?
Prev by thread: subject = "redefining keywords (was: I'm not doing a good job)"
Next by thread: multiple values proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread