[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

No internal DEFINE-SYNTAX?

To: rrrs-authors@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: No internal DEFINE-SYNTAX?
From: "Aubrey Jaffer" <jaffer@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 15:06:45 -0500

In the R4RS macro appendix it says:

  Furthermore, there is no DEFINE-SYNTAX analogue of the internal
  definitions described in section 5.2.2.

Is this because it leads to an contradiction?  Couldn't internal
DEFINE-SYNTAXs be transformed into a LETREC-SYNTAX?

Prev by Date: Re: call/cc and proper tail recursion
Next by Date: No internal DEFINE-SYNTAX?
Prev by thread: call/cc and proper tail recursion
Next by thread: No internal DEFINE-SYNTAX?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread