[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

the next RNRS meeting

>> 2)  I continue to strongly believe in the desirability of a disjoint type for
>> '() in Scheme and reserve the write to restart this argument at the next RNRS
>> meeting.

Given Jinx's clear statements, I am not sure about the merits of
restarting this argument at the next RNRS meeting.  I think there are
other issues that could be profitably discussed.  The two topics I
have in mind are multiple value returns and records.  I propose that
we schedule a meeting for some time this year.  I suggest the next RNRS
meeting be held in White Plains, NY at the SIGPLAN'90 conference in
late June.