[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Programmer-defined data types, version 2
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 89 12:02:13 -0700
From: "Morris J. Katz" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
For aesthetic reasons I would prefer to see
(MAKE-RECORD-TYPE type-name . field-names)
(MAKE-RECORD-TYPE type-name field-names)
as the for for MAKE-RECORD-TYPE.
How do others feel?
I prefer having a single argument which is a list. Not only does this
reduce the number of characters that must be typed, but it simplifies
abstraction on the `field-names' argument, and leaves the argument
list open for adding arguments in the future.