[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

... should be a peculiar identifier

To: chaynes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
Subject: ... should be a peculiar identifier
From: gjs@ZOHAR.AI.MIT.EDU (Gerald Jay Sussman)
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 89 14:26:32 est
Cc: rrrs-authors@mc.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Chris Haynes's message of Sat, 18 Feb 89 21:01:37 -0500

I strongly agree with this proposal.

I also believe that the peculiar identifiers list should be extensible
in this and in any other useful direction.  Users should be free to
pick identifiers so long as they do not conflict with other types.  It
is unnecessary (and unpleasant) for us to PREVENT any exotic features
from being developed that may need identifiers that CANNOT BE confused
with any other syntatic type.

Prev by Date: Re: ... should be a peculiar identifier
Next by Date: Re: ... should be a peculiar identifier
Prev by thread: Re: ... should be a peculiar identifier
Next by thread: Re: ... should be a peculiar identifier
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread