[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 86 10:39:14 est
From: Kent Dybvig <dyb%indiana.csnet at CSNET-RELAY.ARPA>
- Does anyone object to defining (COND) and (CASE) to return unspecified
values? I think this would be a good idea.
I thought that COND and CASE with no match and no ELSE were already defined
to return unspecified values. If not, I think this should be the definition.
No, it's not defined at all - it could be a syntax error, for example.
Can we also have (BEGIN) return an unspecified value instead of being invalid
I am certainly opposed to this.