[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: quotation

To: JAR@mc.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: quotation
From: willc%tekchips%tektronix.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
Date: 19 Feb 86 10:06:11 PST (Wed)
Cc: willc%tektronix.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA, RRRS-AUTHORS@mc.lcs.mit.edu
Comment: Message received over unauthenticated port at tektronix
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 17 Feb 86 22:47:24 EST., <[MC.LCS.MIT.EDU].821043.860217.JAR>

I know I'm stubborn and downright ornery, but I'm surprised to learn that
Jonathan is too.  He's been fooling me all this time.

      Exactly right.  I'd be happy with the judgment of the RRRS on this
      matter if it were made internally consistent, and I think most others
      would also.

    I think you're asking for an awful lot, certainly not something that
    has been achieved elsewhere in the language design.

All I meant is that the wording in one part of the document should be
made consistent with the wording in other parts of the document.

Peace, Will

References:
- quotation
  - From: Jonathan A Rees <JAR@MC.LCS.MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: EQ?, again
Next by Date: EQ?, again
Prev by thread: quotation
Next by thread: EQ?, again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread