[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Revisions to String Proposal

To: CPH%MIT-OZ@mit-mc.ARPA, Scheme@mit-mc.ARPA
Subject: Re: Revisions to String Proposal
From: David Bartley <Bartley%ti-csl.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa>
Date: 22 Mar 1985 1105-CST
cc: Bartley%ti-csl.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa
In-Reply-To: Your message of 20-Mar-85 0242-CST

I am quite pleased with Chris' revised string proposal.

A minor suggestion -- perhaps the = and < comparators could be made
essential and the <=, >, and >= comparators made optional.

Regards,
David Bartley
-------

Prev by Date: Re: Revisions to String Proposal
Next by Date: Re: ASSERT, ports, and NIL
Prev by thread: Re: Revisions to String Proposal
Next by thread: Revisions to String Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread