---------------------------------

SIGGRAPH 2005 Paper Review Form (modified by Fredo)

Review instructions and the SIGGRAPH Ethics Policy are 
available at:

 http://www.siggraph.org/s2005/main.php?f=cfp&p=papers&s=review

Please keep in mind that these are pre-submission. Use your judgment
to give useful feedback and extrapolate when necessary. 

I have omitted the numerical rating question (#5)

1) Briefly describe the paper and its contribution to computer 
graphics and interactive techniques. Please give your assessment
of the scope and magnitude of the paper's contribution.
<BriefDescription>
</BriefDescription>

2) Is the exposition clear?  How could it be improved?
<ExpositionClear>
</ExpositionClear>

3) Are the references adequate?  List any references that are needed.
<AdequateReferences>

</AdequateReferences>

4) Could the work be reproduced by one or more skilled graduate 
students?  Are all important algorithmic or system details discussed 
adequately?  Are the limitations and drawbacks of the work clear?
<Reproducibility>

</Reproducibility>


6) Please rate your expertise in the subject area of the paper on a 
continuous scale from 1 to 3, where: 1=Tyro, 2=Journeyman, 3=Expert.
<Expertise>

</Expertise>

7) Explain your rating by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of
the submission.  Include suggestions for improvement and publication
alternatives, if appropriate. Be thorough -- your explanation will be of
highest importance for any committee discussion of the paper and will
be used by the authors to improve their work. Be fair -- the authors 
spent a lot of effort to prepare their submission, and your evaluation 
will be forwarded to them during the rebuttal period.
<ExplainYourRating>

</ExplainYourRating>

8) List here any questions that you want answered by the author(s) 
during the rebuttal period.
<RebuttalIssues>
</RebuttalIssues>