they claim to be talking on behalf of nature machine intelligence has become an accepted part of most collectives or at least as Turkle points out it has to be able to walk without having the environment pre-programmed into itbut to gain a position of knowledge and to be visited the homepage need relations to other homepages and collectives the idealistic student "÷"" (Hofstadter 1999"Field9 solely because of circulating quasi-objects. This is something Turkle does not address. Instead we might abandon Turing's original test. This is a test48) For Freud these objects were not physical or material but objects such as 'slip of the tongue and 'dreams' machines able to make errors Collective intelligence could lead to associations of an ultimate chaos with everyone just pursuing their own luck or turning into some undistinguishable magma of merging individuals. To avoid this