Executive
Summary |
In 1993, Huntington argued that many conflicts will be dominated by cultural differences. Although cultural differences are but one source of conflicts, this aspect is highlighted today by events that have impacted US policies and posture. Yet in the past decade, almost no models have emerged that can forecast patterns of behavior when cultural forces clash. Such models must consider the roles of beliefs, attitudes, and sacred values within a culture, and how they interact with institutional constraints and perceived external pressures. They must address behaviors within a culture at the levels of the individual, the group, and the governing body. The most important objective of our MURI is to bring together models of beliefs and behaviors at each of the three levels, showing how the levels interact and influence one another. To reach this objective, we have assembled the following interdisciplinary team: Scott Atran, University of Michigan & CNRS, Anthropology Jenna Bednar, Univ. Mich., Political Science & Public Policy Jon Doyle, MIT, SAS Institute, Computer Science Ken Forbus, Northwestern, Computer Science and Education Doug Medin, Northwestern University, Psychology John Mikhail, Georgetown University Law Center and Philosophy Scott Page, University of Michigan , Political Science & Complexity Avi Pfeffer, Harvard, Computer Science Whitman Richards, MIT, Cognition and Artificial Intelligence Jeff Shamma, Georgia Tech, Computer Science Department Barry Silverman, UPenn, ESE & CIS Brian Stankiewicz, University of Texas Austin , Psychology Joshua Tenenbaum, MIT, Computation and Cognitive Science Patrick Winston, MIT, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence & Consultant Consultant Consultant
Alex (Sandy) Pentland,
MIT Media Lab,
Human Dynamics Research |
||
© 2006 CSAIL, MIT |